检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹雅雯 张丹[1] CAO Ya-wen;ZHANG Dan(Department of Radiology,Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University,Chengde,Hebei,067000,China)
机构地区:[1]承德医学院附属医院放射科,河北承德067000
出 处:《承德医学院学报》2022年第6期469-473,共5页Journal of Chengde Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨Schizas形态学分型和硬膜囊面积测量对腰椎管狭窄症的诊断效能。方法随机选择因腰腿痛就诊的84例患者为研究对象,使用Schizas形态学分型和硬膜囊面积测量2种方法对腰椎磁共振结果进行分级,比较两组结果的观察者间一致性和复测可靠性。根据患者的临床诊断结果,分析2种分级的准确率、敏感度、特异性。结果Schizas形态学分型和硬膜囊面积测量2种方法的组间一致性良好。2种分级方法的复测可靠性良好。Schizas分型诊断结果准确率、敏感度、阴性预测值均高于测量分级诊断(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义。结论Schizas分型和硬膜囊面积测量都是可靠的分级系统,2种方法均可用于评估腰椎管狭窄症。与硬膜囊面积测量相比,Schizas分型的临床诊断效能更高。Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Schizas morphological classification and dural sac area measurement in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods Eighty-four patients with low back pain were randomly selected as subjects.Schizas system and dural sac area measurement were used to grade the results of lumbar MRI.The consistency and reliability of the results between the two groups were compared.According to the clinical diagnosis results of the patients,the accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of the two grades were analyzed.Results The consistency between the two methods of Schizas system and dural sac area measurement was excellent.Both classification methods have good retest reliability.The accuracy,sensitivity and negative predictive value of Schizas system were significantly higher than those of DSCA grading system.Conclusion Schizas system and DSCA measurement are reliable grading systems,and both methods can be used to evaluate lumbar spinal stenosis.Compared with DSCA measurement,Schizas system is more efficient in clinical diagnosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49