检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡向坤[1] HU Xiangkun(School of Business Management,Fujian Polytechnic of Information Technology,Fuzhou Fujian 350003,China)
机构地区:[1]福建信息职业技术学院商贸管理学院,福建福州350003
出 处:《重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第6期12-22,共11页Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:全国高等院校计算机基础教育教学研究课题“《实务专题与创新创业》专创融合教材开发与研究”(2021-AFCEC-016)。
摘 要:当前乡村存在的“村账村管”“村账乡管”“村级会计委托代理制”三种会计管理模式,与乡村振兴战略背景下集体经济发展不相适应。文章通过委托代理和会计目标理论比较分析三种模式与乡村振兴之间存在的问题,以期为村集体经济组织会计提供真实可靠的信息,也为反映村委会干部受托责任的履行情况提供理论依据。基于此,就乡村会计制度、人才落实及工作网络化等方面提出改进建议,为完善村级内部控制会计核算提供有益参考。The current three accounting modes of “village accounting under self-management”, “village accounting under township administration” and “village-level accounting principal-agent system” exist in rural areas, which are not suitable for the development of collective economy under the background of rural vitalization strategy. This paper compares and analyzes the problems between the three models and rural vitalization through principal-agent and accounting target theory, and provides a theoretical basis for the village collective economic organization accounting to provide true and reliable information and to reflect the performance of the village committee leaders’ entrusted responsibilities. Based on this, this paper puts forward improvement suggestions on the rural accounting system, talent implementation and work networking, which provides a useful reference for improving village-level internal control accounting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7