检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:芦恒[1] 胡真一 LU Heng;HU Zhen-yi
出 处:《北方论丛》2023年第1期109-124,共16页The Northern Forum
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“东亚乡村振兴的社会政策比较研究”(18ZDA119)。
摘 要:韩国自1962年颁布《农村振兴法》以来,依据不同时期社会发展的切实需求,对法条进行多次修订。但总体而言,该法始终为乡村建设事业的推进提供了稳定的政策助力。中央政府始终是韩国乡村振兴事业推行的核心力量。进入21世纪后,伴随央地间关系的变化,中央政府逐步由“前台”转向“幕后”。央地协作和地方自治型振兴模式逐渐成长为乡村振兴过程中的重要力量。该模式也为中国乡村振兴事业的全面推进提供了经验和启示。Since the promulgation of the Rural Revitalization Act in 1962,South Korea has revised the act several times according to the actual needs of social development in different periods.But overall,the act has always provided a stable policy boost for the promotion of rural construction.The central government of South Korea has always been the core force in promoting rural revitalization.In the new century,along with the change in the central-local relationship,the central government has gradually shifted from the“ront”to the“behind the scenes”.The central-local collaboration and the local autonomy revitalization model is growing to be an important force in the process of rural revitalization.It also provides experience and inspiration for the comprehensive promotion of China’s rural revitalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.254.100