重审宋代《素问》新校正的新视角与新发现  

A new perspective on Su Wen re-collated in the Song Dynasty

作　　者：黄龙祥[1] Huang Longxiang(Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China)

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院针灸研究所,北京100700

出　　处：《中华医史杂志》2022年第5期292-302,共11页Chinese Journal of Medical History

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(19ZDA195)。

摘　　要：北宋政府先后4次校正《素问》,考订了王冰注本中大量经文及注文的错误,有功于王冰注本多矣。但受时代和条件的局限,在底本选择及书名厘定等重大问题上以及其他诸多细节上都出现了失误,甚至是严重的失误。其中对医经传承负面影响最大者,是以王冰注本《素问》《针灸甲乙经》为模板统改其他早期医籍的引经文本,导致传世早期重要医籍的旧貌失真。将宋代馆臣的《素问》新校正置于特定的历史背景和环境中考察,重点考察今人尚未察知的失误,并特别注重失误成因的考察和分析,以为当代医经校注之鉴。The government of the Northern Song Dynasty collated and annotated Su Wen four times from 1026-1118.It examined a large number of errors in the collated edition by Wang Bing,and corrected the edition.However,for reasons of time and conditions,there still existed some mistakes,even serious ones,such as the selection of the original texts and the determination of the titles and many other details as well.Among these mistakes,the one which seriously prevented learning medical classics for following generations was that the quoted texts from early medical books were modified based on the Su Wen collated by Wang Bing and Jia Yi Jing on Acupuncture and Moxibustion.This led to the distortion of some early important medical books.This paper examines the re-collation of Su Wen by the officials of the Song Dynasty in a specific historical background and environment,focuses on the errors that have not been perceived today,and pays attention to the investigation and analysis of the causes of those errors,so as to provide a reference for collation of ancient medical classics today.

关 键 词：《素问》 《黄帝内经》 宋代新校正 文献研究 

分 类 号：R2-5[医药卫生—中医学]