检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张刘燕 厉腊梅 陈韬 李峰[1] 师干伟 李文华[1] 肖建强[1] 冷燕侠 蔡高军[1] ZHANG Liuyan;LI Lamei;CHEN Tao;LI Feng;SHI Ganwei;LI Wenhua;XIAO Jianqiang;LENG Yanxia;CAI Gaojun(Department of Cardiology,Wujin Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University,the Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University,Changzhou,Jiangsu,213017,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属武进医院(常州市武进人民医院)心内科徐州医科大学武进临床学院,江苏常州213017
出 处:《临床心血管病杂志》2022年第10期801-805,共5页Journal of Clinical Cardiology
基 金:常州市社会发展科技项目(No:CE20225003)。
摘 要:目的:探讨反复经同侧远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉(冠脉)介入诊疗的安全性及可行性。方法:回顾性分析本中心2020年6月—2022年5月反复经远端桡动脉入路行冠脉介入诊疗患者数据。结果:共有142例患者反复经同侧远端桡动脉入路行冠脉介入诊疗,年龄67(60,73)岁,其中男99例(69.72%)。距离上一次同侧远端桡动脉介入手术的时间为2 h~2年,中位时间为7.5(1~12)个月。在142例重复经远端桡动脉介入诊疗患者中,2次124例(87.32%),3次17例(11.97%),4次1例(0.70%);总体穿刺成功率92.96%(132/142),2次穿刺成功率为93.55%(116/124),2次以上的成功率为88.89%(16/18)。亚组分析结果表明,女性组重复穿刺成功率为90.70%(39/43),低于男性组93.94%(93/99),但是两组间差异无统计学意义。远端桡动脉穿刺部位出血4例,经重新压迫后止血;前臂血肿1例,发生在更换常规桡动脉入路患者中;2例患者再次手术前发现桡动脉闭塞,经穿刺同侧远端桡动脉后开通闭塞桡动脉,同时完成冠脉介入手术。结论:经同侧远端桡动脉入路重复行冠脉介入诊疗安全可行,有一定的临床应用价值。Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of repeated ipsilateral distal radial artery approach(dRA)for coronary intervention.Methods:The data of patients who underwent repeated coronary intervention through the ipsilateral dRA in our center from June 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 142 patients underwent repeated coronary intervention through the ipsilateral dRA,aged 67(60,73)years,and 99 patients(69.72%)were male.The interval time since the last ipsilateral dRA intervention was 2 hours to 2 years,with a median of 7.5(1-12)months.Among them,124(87.32%)patients were treated twice,17(11.97%)three times,and 1(0.70%)four times.The total puncture success rate was 92.96%(132/142),the second puncture success rate was 93.55%(116/124),and the success rate more than two times was 88.89%(16/18).The results of subgroup analysis showed that the success rate of repeated puncture in the female group was 90.70%(39/43),which was lower than that in the male group 93.94%(93/99).However,the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.There were four cases of bleeding at the puncture site,which was stopped after re-compression.One patient with forearm hematoma was found in the conventional radial artery approach.Two patients were found to have radial artery occlusion before repeated operations.The occluded radial artery was recanalization and coronary intervention was completed via successfully puncturing the ipsilateral dRA.Conclusion:Repeated coronary intervention through the ipsilateral dRA approach is safe and feasible,and has clinical application value.
分 类 号:R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222