检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑玉英 ZHENG Yuying(English language school,Sichuan International Studies University,Chongqing 400031,China)
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2022年第11期51-58,共8页Journal of Leshan Normal University
基 金:四川外国语大学市级研究生科研创新项目“体认像似性视角下问答行为的多模态互动研究”(CYS22494)。
摘 要:采用量表问卷调查法对160名高校学生进行调查,探讨了情感共情与人称视角对汉语隐喻句情绪评级的影响。结果表明:(1)在情绪效价维度,情感共情和人称视角对汉语隐喻句情绪评级均无显著影响;(2)在情绪唤醒度维度,情感共情和人称视角对汉语隐喻句情绪评级均有显著影响,其中,高共情能力组对隐喻句情绪唤醒度评级分数显著高于低情感共情能力组,第二人称积极隐喻句的情感唤醒度评级分数显著高于第三人称积极隐喻句,但消极隐喻句评级分数不受人称视角影响。A questionnaire survey was conducted among 160 college students to explore the influences of affective empathy and perspectives on the emotional ratings of Chinese metaphoric sentences.The results showed that:(1)neither affective empathy nor perspectives exerted significant influences on the emotional valence ratings of Chinese metaphoric sentences;(2)both affective empathy and perspectives significantly affected the emotional arousal ratings of Chinese metaphoric sentences.Specifically,in terms of emotional arousal,participants with high affective empathy rated the metaphoric sentences higher than did participants with low affective empathy,and positive metaphoric sentences with the second person perspective were rated higher than those with the third-person perspective,while the rating of negative metaphoric sentences was not modulated by perspectives.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15