检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘艳红[1] PAN Yanhong(Party School of Jiangsu Provincial Party Committee,Nanjing 210009,China)
机构地区:[1]中共江苏省委党校,南京210009
出 处:《安徽开放大学学报》2022年第4期7-11,共5页Journal of Anhui Open University
摘 要:互联网经济领域反垄断立法落后于互联网经济的发展已是不争之实,首要问题便是经营者市场支配地位的认定标准。《反垄断法》确立的单一市场结构标准面临市场份额计算的困境以及市场份额与市场支配地位关联度不高等难题,虽然《禁止滥用市场支配地位行为暂行规定》《国务院反垄断委员会关于平台经济领域的反垄断指南》等规范性文件对互联网领域经营者市场支配地位的认定做了有益探索,将传统的市场结构标准与互联网领域的特殊考量因素相结合进行综合考察,但这种范式不可避免地增加反垄断调查工作量和举证难度。因此,通过改变计算对象和引入流量份额来完善市场结构标准,可以更准确地认定互联网领域经营者市场支配地位。It is an indisputable fact that anti-monopoly legislation in the field of the Internet economy lags behind the development of the Internet economy,and the primary issues is the identification standard of the operator’s dominant market position.The single market structure standard established by the“Anti-Monopoly Law”faces the dilemma of market share calculation and the low correlation between market share and market dominance.Although the“Interim Provisions on Prohibition of Abuse of Dominant Market Position”and the“Anti-monopoly Guidelines of the Anti-Monopoly Commission of the State Council on the Platform Economy”and other normative documents have made useful explorations on the identification of market dominance of operators in the Internet field,combining traditional market structure standards with special considerations in the Internet field for a comprehensive examination,this paradigm inevitably increases the workload of antimonopoly investigations and the difficulty of producing evidence.Therefore,by changing the calculation objects and introducing traffic shares to improve the market structure standards,we can more accurately identify the market dominance of operators in the Internet field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222