检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴偎立[1] 郑梦圆 平新乔[2] Wu Weili;Zheng Mengyuan;Ping Xinqiao(School of Finance,Central University of Finance and Economics;School of Economics,Peking University)
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学金融学院,北京100081 [2]北京大学经济学院,北京100871
出 处:《经济科学》2022年第6期142-159,共18页Economic Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(项目编号:71702205);“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”的资助。
摘 要:土地流转和农业生产托管是实现农业规模化经营的两条路径。本文研究了两者的差异及其互动关系,发现:第一,土地流转可同时实现土地经营权和生产过程集中,进而同时提高土地产出水平和生产效率;相反,农业生产托管仅可实现生产过程集中,但由于无法实现土地经营权集中,加之托管费与土地产出水平脱钩,农业生产托管难以提高土地产出水平。第二,农业生产托管的出现降低了家庭农场相对农户的比较优势,对通过土地流转实现经营权集中有抑制作用。第三,差异化财政补贴可提高农户接受农业生产托管的意愿,但同时会延缓通过土地流转实现经营权集中的进程。Agricultural production trust and land transfer are two primary paths to achieve large-scale agricultural operation.This paper studies the discrepancy and the interaction between the two and draws the following conclusions.(1)Land transfer can achieve the concentration of both land management rights and agricultural production process simultaneously,and thus increases agricultural output and efficiency.In contrast,agricultural production trust can only achieve the concentration of agricultural production process.Because agricultural production trust cannot achieve the concentration of management rights and the trust fee is uncorrelated with land output,it cannot increase land output.(2)The introduction of agricultural production trust reduces the comparative advantage of family farms relative to individual farmers,thereby discouraging land transfer and inhibiting the progress of land management rights concentration.(3)Differentiated fiscal subsidies increase the willingness of individual farmers to entrust their agricultural production,thereby discouraging land transfer and slowing the progress of land management rights concentration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15