检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闪洪 Shan Hong
出 处:《当代修辞学》2022年第6期81-93,共13页Contemporary Rhetoric
基 金:2020年国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目“网络空间社会治理语言问题研究”(项目号:20&ZD299);2021年复旦大学义乌研究院项目“《修辞学发凡》‘零度’修辞观的历史意义与当代阐释——以《共产党宣言》多语种译本的研究为例”(项目号:WAH3151005)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:语体交叉渗透是语体互文的结果,是促进语体创新和产生新语体的重要方式,体现为整体融合和局部融合两种方式。从语篇生成角度看,语体交叉渗透反映了语体成分要素融合的程度,还直接体现为依托不同的互文机制生成不同的互文语义类型。研究发现,两种融合方式的互文类型分别为互嵌式与包孕式:互嵌式推动新质的产生,是不同语体互嵌的结果,以整体互嵌的方式实现语体高度融合;包孕式则不改变语体的性质,主语体以局部包孕次语体的方式实现渗透。语体交叉渗透的不同类型具有不同的互文实现路径:互嵌式的语篇语义生成是单线语义互涉,主要以关键词、结构潜式、修辞手段为互文机制;包孕式的语篇语义生成是多线语义互涉,以态度评价、语义阐释为互文机制。对语体交叉渗透类型及互文实现路径的描写解释,能从语篇语义生成层面揭示其互动本质,进而在社会、历史两个维度下探索其修辞动因及语言运用规律。Stylistic cross penetration is the result of stylistic intertextuality, and it is an important way to promote stylistic innovation and generate new stylistic. From the perspective of discourse generation, stylistic cross penetration not only reflects the different degree of fusion of stylistic elements, but also directly reflects the generation of different intertextual semantic types relying on different intertextual mechanisms. It is found that the intertextual types of the two fusion methods are respectively interembedding and inclusive. The interworking promotes the generation of new qualities, which is the result of the interworking of different language styles and achieves a high degree of fusion of language styles in a holistic way. The inclusive form does not change the nature of the style, and the main form penetrates through the way of partial inclusive substyle. Different types of stylistic cross penetration have different paths to intertextuality. Intertextual semantic generation of intertextuality is single-line semantic intertextuality, which mainly uses keywords, structural latent and rhetorical devices as intertextuality mechanism. The discourse semantic generation of the inclusive model is multi-line semantic interinvolvement, with attitude evaluation and semantic interpretation as the intertextual mechanism. The description and explanation of the types of cross-osmosis and the path of intertextuality can reveal the nature of their interaction from the level of discourse semantic generation, and then explore their rhetorical motivations and the rules of language use from both social and historical dimensions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.64.200