检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白婴曦 Bai Yingxi(People’s Procuratorate of Huangpu District,Shanghai 200020,China)
出 处:《上海公安学院学报》2022年第5期52-58,96,共8页Journal of Shanghai Police College
摘 要:对于挂失领取本人账户下他人存款行为的性质认定,大多数学者与司法实务工作者都围绕着诈骗罪、盗窃罪与侵占罪这三个罪名之间进行探讨与争论,却忽略了这一类案件中被害人的行为对于案件性质的认定也是存在巨大的影响的。从被害人教义学的角度,运用被害人自陷风险理论,就会得出截然不同的结论。在此类案件中,被害人意识到风险的存在并且在负有责任、能够采取相应措施阻止危害结果发生的情况下,却没有及时进行制止,就不能够将责任归咎于行为人,应当由被害人自行承担损害结果。As to how to judge the nature of the behavior of reporting the loss and drawing other person’s deposits in his or her accounts,most scholars and judicial practitioners have exploratorily discussed whether this behavior fits one of the three charges:fraud,larceny or embezzlement,however they have neglected the fact that the behavior of victims in such cases also considerably affect the judgement of the nature of the case.From the perspective of the doctrine of the victim,the application of the victim’s self trapping risk theory will lead to a different conclusion.In such cases,if the victim who knows there is risk and can take corresponding measures to prevent the loss from happening,but fails to stop it in time,the responsibility cannot be attributed to the perpetrator,and the victim should assume the responsibility of his or her loss.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198