检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈思思 何俊卿 郑祥[3] 徐慧芳[1,2] Chen Sisi;He Junqing;Zheng Xiang;Xu Huifang(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Department of Library Information and Archives Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School of Environment&Natural Resources,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京100190 [2]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京100190 [3]中国人民大学环境学院,北京100872
出 处:《科技管理研究》2022年第21期176-184,共9页Science and Technology Management Research
摘 要:从专利价值评估工具的视角分析专利价值评估的发展现状。对常见专利价值评估工具的功能进行详细介绍,在此基础之上总结不同类型的工具所用的评估方法和评价指标,讨论专利价值评估的发展现状和存在的问题,并给出建议。目前,专利价值评估呈现出评估方法智能化和自动化、评价维度和指标类型多样化、评估模型精细化的发展趋势。但国内关于专利货币价值评估的研究有待进一步完善。在未来,专利价值评估需要将不同的评价方式有机结合,针对不同领域专利的特点构建相应的价值评价方法和评价体系。This paper analyzes the development status of patent evaluation from the perspective of evaluation tools.Based on a detailed introduction to the functions of common patent evaluation tools,the evaluation methods and indicators used by different tools are summarized,the development trend and existing problems of patent evaluation are discussed,and the corresponding suggestions are given.From a development perspective,the methods of patent evaluation are more intelligent and automated,more types of evaluation indicators with different evaluation dimensions are developed and the evaluation model is constantly optimized.However,domestic research on monetary value evaluation needs to be further improved.In the future,it is necessary to combine different evaluation methods and adopt the evaluation methods and evaluation systems according to the characteristics of the patent in different fields.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15