检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔笛[1] 高影繁[1] 李岩[1] 刘志辉[1] Cui Di;Gao Yingfan;Li Yan;Liu Zhihui(Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出 处:《科技管理研究》2022年第19期89-96,共8页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:青海省重点研发与转化计划项目“基于科技大数据的企业深度价值评估系统开发与应用”(2021-GX-113);中国科学技术信息研究所重点工作项目“上市公司年报数据库建设及服务系统研发”(ZD2022-11)。
摘 要:以相关政策文件和事实数据为基础构建一种基于PEP-H四要素模型的科技型上市企业遴选方法,并以全部A股上市企业为遴选样本,借助企业市场竞争力评估模型进行实证研究发现,相较于非科技型上市企业,本方法所遴选的科技型上市企业整体上具备相对更高的收益水平、更快的资产增长速度,以及更强的财务稳定性和抗风险能力,但仍然与国家级高新技术上市企业存在一定差距;在国家级高新技术企业中,又以通过核心要素遴选的企业具备更强的综合市场竞争力。实证结果表明研究所提出的科技型上市企业遴选办法是简单、科学且有效的。Based on relevant policy documents and factual data, this research constructs a selection method of science and technology-based listed companies based on the PEP-H four-element model, takes all A-share listed companies as the selection samples, and uses the enterprise market competitiveness evaluation model to conduct the empirical research. The study found that compared with non-tech listed companies, the science and technology-based listed companies selected by this method have relatively higher returns, faster asset growth, and stronger financial stability and anti-risk capabilities, but there is still a certain gap with the national high-tech listed enterprises. Among the national high-tech enterprises, the enterprises selected through the core elements have stronger comprehensive market competitiveness. The above research results show that the selection method proposed by this research is simple,scientific and effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40