检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚鹤徽[1] 赵雅丽 YAO He-hui;ZHAO Ya-li(Law School of Hunan Normal University,Changsha,410081,China)
出 处:《福建江夏学院学报》2022年第6期86-92,共7页Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University
摘 要:对与体育赛事画面相关的191个诉讼案例进行分析,实证结果表明:司法实践中,法院对体育赛事画面的性质认识有别,在法律适用上也存在一定的问题,导致同案不同判现象。体育赛事画面的独创性,以有无作为判断标准,只要体育赛事画面的制作具备了一定的个性化选择空间,就应当构成我国著作权法上的视听作品。立法应遵循技术中立原则,设立“向公众传播权”,以规制交互式或非交互式等各种技术手段传播体育赛事画面的行为;同时,扩大广播组织权的主体范围,使其涵盖网络播放组织。The empirical analysis of 191 litigation cases related to sports event images shows that in judicial practice,courts lack a uniform definition of the nature of sports event images,and there are certain problems in the application of the law,resulting in the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case.The originality of sports event images should be judged on the basis of whether they are available or not,as long as the production of sports event images has a certain space for individual choice,they should constitute audiovisual works under China's copyright law.The legislation should follow the principle of technology neutrality and establish the"right of communication to the public"to regulate the dissemination of sports images by various technical means,such as interactive or non-interactive,etc.At the same time,the scope of the subject of broadcasting organization right should be expanded to cover network broadcasting organizations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.245.229