对《本事、故事与叙事--唐传奇〈柳毅传〉的表演研究》的简短回应  

A Brief Response to“Event,Story and Narration:A Performance Study of the Chuanqi of the Tang Dynasty‘Liu Yi Zhuan’”

作　　者：赵世瑜[1] ZHAO Shiyu

机构地区：[1]北京大学历史学系,北京100871

出　　处：《民俗研究》2022年第6期16-19,154,共5页Folklore Studies

摘　　要：学术批评是学术界应有之常态,值得大力提倡,但前提是对被批评者的学术史脉络、问题意识和方法论立场有全面、准确的梳理和了解。由于各自学科问题不同,学术史脉络不同,跨学科的学术讨论不应仅从本学科的问题出发,以论他学科的问题之非,还应从他学科的立场出发去立论和言说,才不至于有失公允,避免各说各话。Academic criticism is normal in the academic world and is worthy of strong advocacy,but only if one has a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the academic history,problem awareness,and methodological stance of the criticized.Since the issues of each different discipline and the academic history are different,the interdisciplinary academic discussion should not only start from the issues of the discipline to discuss the faults of the issues of other disciplines,but also should make arguments from the positions of other disciplines in order not to be unfair and to avoid saying different things.

关 键 词：学术批评 历史人类学 民间文学 《柳毅传》 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]