检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡伟斌[1] 黄祖辉[1] Hu Weibin;Huang Zuhui(China Academy for Rural Development,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学中国农村发展研究院,浙江杭州310058
出 处:《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2022年第8期28-46,共19页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD790053);浙江省社科规划重大项目“共同富裕现代化基本单元建设研究”。
摘 要:信任对村庄社会秩序构建和经济发展具有良好的润滑作用。以股份合作为主要形式的农村集体产权制度改革,不仅能促进集体经济发展和农民增收,而且对村庄信任也具有积极的增进作用。研究发现,股份合作制改革对村庄的制度信任和人际信任均有显著的正向影响,其中对村党支部等村级组织和同村人的信任促进作用最大,并在村庄和农民个体层面均存在一定的影响异质性。因此,要以农村集体产权制度改革为契机,重塑和培育新时代乡村信任体系,推进政策协同设计与集成改革,加强村级组织和干部队伍建设工作,以数字技术加强对集体“三资”的管理和监管,提高村庄信任水平和乡村公共情感治理绩效。As a key dimension of emotional governance in rural communities, trust plays a key role in lubricating the construction of social order and economic development in villages. Due to the mobility of rural population, the weakening of collective identity and the loss of collective assets, the traditional trust system in villages is gradually disappearing, which is reflected by the weakening of trust on both the formal institutions and interpersonal relationships. The reform of rural collective property rights, as an important institutional innovation, not only involves the growth and development of the rural collective economy and protects the villagers’ property rights and interests, but also has an important impact on the reconstruction of the trust system within a village. There have been a rich body of researches on the former aspect of performance, but the latter has received little attention from scholars and empirical research on the trust of the reform in the village is rare. In order to fill this research gap,this study creatively explores the spillover impact of the rural collective property rights system reform on the trust from the perspective of institutional evolution and property rights order change, by using the survey data of 1, 657 farmers from 87 villages in 18 provinces. The study enriches and expands the research on the relationship between collective property rights reform and effective rural governance.The main findings of this study are as follows. First, as for institutional trust, the rural collective property rights system reform has a significant positive impact on the villagers’ trust on village Party branches, village committees and local judicial departments, among which the impact on village Party branches is the strongest, followed by that on village committees. However, the rural collective property rights system reform does not have any significant effect on the villagers’ trust on the county and township governments. As for interpersonal trust, the reform significantly promo
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28