论海上交通肇事犯罪中事故调查报告的刑事证据审查  

Research on the criminal evidence review of investigation reports in maritime traffic accident crimes

作　　者：徐拿云 XU Na-yun(Law School,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China)

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2022年第4期52-62,共11页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

基　　金：2021年度中华全国总工会科研项目“海员权益保障与海上交通事故刑事归责的协调化研究”(84210006);2022年度大连海事大学青年教师科技创新项目“证人证言可信性研究”(3132022301)。

摘　　要：海上交通肇事案件的事实认定,涉及一系列专门性问题。在当前司法实践中,该类案件事故调查报告的审查认定呈现出一定程度的形式化倾向。事故调查报告可采性审查的形式化、证明力评价的预设化、事实认定主体的错位化,充分暴露了法官对海上交通事故调查报告过度依赖的危险性及其逻辑谬误。为应对海上交通肇事犯罪中运用海上交通事故调查报告所面临的多重困境,应当对海上交通事故调查报告中涉及专门性问题的意见的审查认定规则进行反思,防止由事故调查人员替代法官成为实质的事实认定者。The fact-finding of maritime traffic accident cases involves a series of professional issues.In the current judicial practice,the review and determination of accident investigation reports in such cases have a certain degree of formalization tendency.The formalization of the admissibility review of the accident investigation reports,the presupposition of the evaluation of the probative force,and the dislocation of the fact-finder have fully exposed the danger of the judge’s over-reliance on the marine traffic accident investigation reports,as well as the logical fallacies in it.In order to deal with the multiple difficulties faced by the use of marine traffic accident investigation reports in marine traffic accident crimes,the review and determination rules for opinions involving professional issues in marine traffic accident investigation reports should be reconsidered,and the replacement of substantive fact-finders from judges to accident investigators should be prevented.

关 键 词：海上交通肇事犯罪 事故调查报告 专门性问题 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]