检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施旭[1] SHI Xu(School of Contemporary Chinese Discourse Studies,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学当代中国话语研究院,杭州310018
出 处:《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第6期73-85,共13页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:国家安全观是一个国家安全战略的基石,也是国际安全对话与治理的工具;在当今世界动荡与变革交织、安全赤字凸显的条件下,厘清大国国家安全观的特性与联系,其学术价值和现实意义不言而喻。本文从文化话语研究视角出发,提出国家安全观的解析框架,以中、美、俄国家安全政策话语为实证依据,揭示三国在国家安全观上的异同关系和权势关系。文章指出,在国家安全观上,中、俄之间具有重要的契合关系,而中、俄两国与美国却存在明显的差异关系,并且与后者处于矛盾状态。基于分析结果,本文提出中国国家安全对外话语体系建设的策略建议。The doctrine of national security is a cornerstone of a nation s security strategy and an essential tool for international security dialogue governance.In the face of the growing instability and uncertainty of the world today,it is of self-evident academic value and practical significance to clarify the characteristics and connections of the doctrines of national security of major countries.Proceeding from a cultural-discursive perspective,this paper proposes an analytic and explanatory framework of the doctrine of national security.Based on the national security policy discourse of China,the United States,and Russia,it reveals the similarities and differences and power relations in the doctrines of national security of the three countries.It is shown that China and Russia share fundamental features in their doctrines of national security while differing in crucial ways from the United States.Based on the research results,it proposes a set of global communication strategies for China in safeguarding national security and advancing international security.
分 类 号:D631[政治法律—政治学] D771.2[政治法律—中外政治制度] D751.2
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.100.204