认罪认罚从宽制度中量刑建议的风险及其控制  

The Alienation Risk and Control of Sentencing Recommendations in the Plea-for-leniency System

作　　者：简琨益 杨乐 Jian Kunyi;Yang Le(School of Law,Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,Kunming 650051,Yunnan,China)

机构地区：[1]云南财经大学法学院,云南昆明650051

出　　处：《学术探索》2022年第12期78-84,共7页Academic Exploration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(21XFX008)。

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度的量刑建议是检察机关诉讼监督权的重要组成部分,具有刚性监督内涵。法官对于量刑建议仅限于自愿性、真实性与合法性的审查,原则上不能基于直觉对已经达成的量刑建议进行随意调整。实践中控辩审三方基于自我立场考量可能使形成量刑意见的量刑协商走向风险。为避免这种风险,需要对商谈型量刑的方式进行提倡,控辩双方均应受到信用原则约束,对简化审判程序提供保障。Sentencing recommendations in the plea-for-leniency system is an important part of the procuratorate s litigation supervision power.The judge s review of sentencing recommendations is limited to the review of voluntariness,authenticity and legality.The sentencing recommendations that have been reached cannot be adjusted arbitrarily out of intuition.In practice,however,the procuratorate,defenders,and judges based on self-interest considerations may alienate sentencing negotiations that forms sentencing recommendations.In order to avoid such alienation,it is necessary to advocate the way of sentencing through negotiation.Both the prosecution and the defense should be bound by the principle of credit,and the concept of trial needs to be transformed into abandoning a full trial.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽制度 量刑建议 量刑协商 风险控制 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]