作为试验手段的复议前置制度  

Pilot Practice of Prepositioning of Administrative Reconsideration System

作　　者：王学辉[1] 唐成余 WANG Xuehui;TANG Chengyu(School of Administrative Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Yubei Chongqing,401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆渝北401120

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第6期74-85,共12页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“行政法秩序下的行政批示研究”(18BFX054);西南政法大学科研创新项目“第三人介入行政侵权的赔偿责任研究”(2021XZXS–342)。

摘　　要：近年来,推动行政复议成为化解行政争议主渠道的呼声越来越高。早期的行政复议制度存在同案不同判、中立性无法保证等弊端,导致其公信力较弱。实现行政复议成为化解行政争议的主渠道,核心要义是完善行政复议制度,首要课题是恢复行政复议制度的公信力。从长远来看,应将行政复议前置制度视为一项试验手段,通过确立行政复议前置标准逐步扩大行政复议前置的适用范围,重建行政复议的制度公信力。结合行政复议前置的判定标准和行政行为的现实特征,当前可以将政府信息公开行为、负担行政行为、授益行政行为等具体行政行为确定为行政复议前置的试验领域。In recent years,appeals for resolving administrative disputes by means of administrative reconsideration is getting louder. But,due to the disadvantages of“different judgments in the same case”and the inability to guarantee neutrality in the practice of the administrative reconsideration system at earlier time,the credibility of the administrative reconsideration system is weakened. The essence of administrative dispute resolution through administrative reconsideration is the improvement of the administrative reconsideration system. The primary issue to be solved is to restore the credibility of the administrative reconsideration system,which can be done through pilot practice of prepositioning of reconsideration system.to promote the practice of the administrative reconsideration system. Considering the criteria of reconsideration system prepositioning and characteristics of administrative behaviors,we suggest experimenting prepositioning of reconsideration system in cases of government information disclosure,benefit-infringing and benefit-rendering administrative acts.

关 键 词：行政争议化解 行政复议 复议前置 复议衔接 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D912.112[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]