检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程威威 CHENG Weiwei(School of History,Anhui University,Hefei 230031,China)
出 处:《洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第6期24-29,共6页Journal of Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:财政是国家机器的重要组成部分,国家财政收入水平的高低直接决定了国家能否良好的履行职能、维护统治。明初财政规模的估算因国家赋税制度、财政制度、货币制度的复杂性、多样性而困难重重。16世纪以后,万历以降,以“白银货币化”为基础的货币制度发生变化,从而诱发赋税制度、财政制度的连锁反应。中国开始由古代赋役国家向赋税国家转型。笔者以此为背景,对万历年间财政收入规模进行估算,并对宋熙宁、明万历、清乾隆三朝的财政规模进行比较。论证万历年间财政收入水平的高低,并对明末财政系统崩溃的原因进行初步思考。Finance is an important part of the state machinery.The level of national financial revenue directly determines whether the state can perform its functions well and maintain its ruling.It seems difficult to estimate the fiscal scale in the early Ming Dynasty because of the complexity and diversity of the national tax system,fiscal system and monetary system.After the 16th century,the monetary system based on"silver monetization"changed,which induced a chain reaction of tax system and fiscal system.China began to transform from an ancient penal state to a modern tax state.Based on such transformation,the author,comparing the fiscal scales of Xi′ning,Wanli and Qianlong dynasties and demonstrating the level of financial income in Wanli period,analyzes the fiscal revenue scale of Wanli period and gives a preliminary consideration to the reasons for the collapse of financial system at the end of Ming Dynasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.224