检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董连忠[1] Dong Lianzhong(China University of Labor Relations,Beijing 100048,China)
机构地区:[1]中国劳动关系学院,北京100048
出 处:《廊坊师范学院学报(自然科学版)》2022年第4期113-117,共5页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:中国劳动关系学院教改课题“基于《中国英语能力等级量表》的大学英语校本考试效度研究——以我校大学英语期末考试为例”(JG202157)。
摘 要:通过某高校19级法学、经济管理和财务管理3个班第三学期的大学英语期末考试(SET3)与CET4成绩的相关性分析,对大学英语校本学业成就考试效度进行探析。研究发现,两个考试的内容和任务基本相同,总成绩高度相关,单项成绩呈中度相关;内部相关SET3呈弱到中度,而CET4呈高度相关;两个考试总体难度均较大,SET3的汉译英、写作和阅读部分的选词填空难度相对较小。研究建议:为提升大学英语校本学业成就考试效度,应减少多项选择题,增加综合性测试任务;建立基于《量表》的校本大学英语测试体系;加强教师测评素养培训,促进大学英语教师综合素质的全面提升与发展。This study,using the correlational analysis of scores of the 3rd end-term examination of College English(SET3) and CET4 of students of law,economic management and financial management in a university,examined the validity of school-based college English end-term examination.The study found that the content and test tasks of the two examinations were basically the same,with a high correlation between the total scores and the individual scores;SET3 showed a weak to moderate internal correlation,while CET4 showed a high correlation;both examinations generally have higherdifficulty,and the sections of translation from Chinese to English,writing and banked cloze of reading of SET3 were relatively less difficult.It is suggested in this study that,to improve the validity of the school-based achievement examinations,the test task of multiple choice questions be reduced while increasing comprehensive test tasks;establish the university-based test systems based on China′s Standards of English Language Ability;strengthen the training of teacher assessment quality,promoting the comprehensive improvement and development of College English teachers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.108.175