检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章程荃 ZHANG Chengquan(School of Criminal Justice,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
出 处:《鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第6期91-96,共6页Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:在我国司法实践中,对于死刑制度的执行还存在不统一的问题,有必要从价值论视角对死刑使用逻辑进行再思考。死刑的价值基础在于公平价值和功利价值。适用死刑在规范阶层、必要性阶层、执行阶层应当符合相应的价值基础,同时价值基础应该从公平价值逐渐向功利价值倾斜。死缓限制减刑制度具有执行属性,体现在其于刑罚论中是一种刑罚执行制度,在死刑制度体系中具有相对独立的地位。因此有必要在适用死刑时进行第四层判断,即以死缓考验期内犯罪分子人身危险性为标准进行是否适用限制减刑制度的判断。In the judicial practice of our country,there exist the non-uniform problem of executing the death penalty system,so it is necessary to rethink the logic of using the death penalty from the perspective of value theory.The value basis of death penalty lies in the fair value and utilitarian value.The application of death penalty should conform to the corresponding value basis in the normative class,necessity class and execution class,and at the same time the value basis should gradually incline from the fair value to the utilitarian value.The system of restricted commutation of death penalty with reprieve has the property of execution,which is reflected in the fact that it is a kind of execution system in the penalty theory,and has a relatively independent status in the institutional system of death penalty.Therefore,it is necessary to make the fourth level of judgment when applying the death penalty,that is,judging whether to apply the system of restriction of commutation on the basis of the criteria of the criminal's personal danger in the probation period of death penalty with reprieve.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.80.161