废止收容教育:“主动式”合宪性审查的一次尝试  

Abolishing Detention Education:An Attempt at "Proactive" Constitutional Review

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:赵玉洁 陈方政 ZHAO Yu-jie;CHEN Fang-zheng(Shandong Judge Training College,Jinan,Shandong 250100;Law School of Shandong University(Weihai),Weihai,Shandong 264200)

机构地区:[1]山东法官培训学院,山东济南250100 [2]山东大学(威海)法学院,山东威海264200

出  处:《泰山学院学报》2022年第5期95-102,共8页Journal of Taishan University

摘  要:2019年底,全国人大常委会作出废止实施收容教育制度的决定。关于《决定》的行为性质,目前学界仍存在较大争议。对法律废止决定进行类型化分析,《决定》实质上是因存在合宪性缺陷而作出的法律废止活动,具有“违宪纠正”的特殊属性,属于宪法监督范畴。当前,鉴于收容教育存在的宪法问题及我国合宪性审查制度的实施现状,将《决定》行为性质理解为一种“主动式”合宪性审查,对于进一步推进我国的合宪性审查工作,具有积极的理论和现实意义。At the end of 2019,Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress made a decision to abolish the implementation of the detention education system,but there is still considerable controversy in the academic circles about the nature of the "Decision".A typological analysis of the decision on repeal of the law shows that the Decision is essentially a law repeal activity due to the existence of constitutional deficiencies,which has a special attribute of "unconstitutional correction" and belongs to the category of constitutional supervision.At present,in view of the constitutional problems existing in detention education and the implementation status of our country’s constitutional review system,the nature of the "Decision" behavior is understood as a "proactive" constitutional review,which is of positive theoretical and practical significance to the further advancement of our country’s constitutional review work.

关 键 词:收容教育 合宪性审查 宪法监督 

分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象