破解“两个黑格尔”问题的新契机:论“法哲学讲义”中的君权  

A New Opportunity to Solve the Question of“Two Hegels”:The Monarchy in Lectures on the Philosophy of Right

作　　者：梁燕晓 Liang Yanxiao(Department of Philosophy,Party School of the Central Committee of C.P,C.,Bejing 100091,China)

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)哲学教研部,北京100091

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2022年第6期46-55,共10页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“青年马克思政治哲学中的‘黑格尔因素’研究”(项目批准号:21CZX011);2022年度中共中央党校(国家行政学院)校级青年科研项目“马克思政治哲学视域下的全过程人民民主与西式民主比较研究”(项目批准号:2022QN029)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：君权理论,长期以来都是解读黑格尔法哲学的绊脚石,也是黑格尔在政治哲学谱系中遭致诋毁的原因之一。为了挽救黑格尔的政治形象,哈贝马斯、里特尔等学者曾试图挖掘强调主体间协商民主的“青年黑格尔”与强调市民自由的“市民社会的黑格尔”,并由此引发了“两个黑格尔”的争论,但这实际上都是在承认专断君权存在的前提下另辟蹊径的一种回避策略。而七本“法哲学讲义”的陆续出版,则为重估此理论提供了新的材料和契机。通过对法哲学正式出版物与课堂讲义的比较,以及对伊尔廷的对立说和洛苏尔多的统一说的考察,本文表明黑格尔的君权理论事实上阐述的是一种“立宪虚君”,这也为解决关于“两个黑格尔”的争论提供了新契机。The monarchy theory has long been a stumbling block to the interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy of law,and it is also one of the sources of Hegel’s denigration in the pedigree of political philosophy.In order to save this political image of Hegel,scholars such as Habermas and Ritter,have tried to explore the“young Hegel”that emphasizes intersubjective deliberative democracy and the“Hegel of civil society”that emphasizes civil freedom,thus leading to a debate about“two Hegels.”But this is actually an evasive strategy under the premise of acknowledging the existence of arbitrary monarchy.The publication of Lectures on the Philosophy of Right has provided new materials and opportunities for reassessing this theory.The comparison between the official publications of Philosophy of Right and Lectures on the Philosophy of Right,as well as the inspection of Ilting’s theory of opposition and Losurdo’s theory of unity,shows that Hegel’s monarchy is actually a“constitutional virtual monarchy,”which also provides a new opportunity to resolve the debate about“two Hegels.”

关 键 词：黑格尔 君权 法哲学讲义 伊尔廷 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]