“一国两制”台湾方案反外部法律介入问题探析  

Precautions against Foreign Legal Intervention in the Taiwan Policy of One Country,Two Systems

作　　者：王鹤亭[1] Wang Heting

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学政治与公共管理学院,河南新乡453002

出　　处：《台湾研究集刊》2022年第6期17-33,共17页Taiwan Research Journal

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九届六中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目(22ZDA125)。

摘　　要：综合“一国两制”台湾方案既有构想、外部法律介入港台事务的异同和完全统一前后美国涉台介入的可能变化等多个方面因素进行考虑,外部势力对未来“一国两制”台湾方案及其实践的法律介入可能以方案中的“高度自治”、中央与特别行政区关系、管治权与自治权关系等为着力点。面对外部法律介入,一方面要加强外交、政治乃至于军事等方面的沟通与斗争,另一方面也要充分运用法律手段,优化“一国两制”台湾方案的法律构造和实践机制。反介入机制的法律构造大致可以从两个相互关联的路径入手,即“一国两制”台湾方案中静态权力配置的“法制化”,以及“一国两制”台湾实践中动态运行机制的“法治化”。Considering the existing concept of the One Country,Two Systems,the similarities and differences of foreign legal intervention in Hong Kong and Taiwan Affairs,and the potential change in U.S.intervention before and after reunification,this paper argues that foreign legal intervention on the Taiwan policy of One Country,Two Systems may focus on the notion of“high-degree autonomy”,the relationship between the central government and the Special Administrative Region,as well as the relationship between jurisdiction and autonomy.In the face of foreign legal intervention,we should,on the one hand,strengthen negotiation and struggle in diplomatic,political and even military spheres.On the other hand,we should fully exercise legal means and optimize the legal structure and practical mechanism of the Taiwan policy.The legal structure of the anti-intervention mechanism can be established from two interrelated paths,namely,the institutionalization of the static power allocation in the Taiwan policy and the legalization of the dynamic operation mechanism in the implement of One Country,Two Systems.

关 键 词：“一国两制” 台湾方案 外部法律介入 

分 类 号：D618[政治法律—政治学]