检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马光[1] 毛启扬 Ma Guang;Mao Qiyang
机构地区:[1]浙江大学光华法学院
出 处:《国际经济法学刊》2022年第4期45-62,共18页Journal of International Economic Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“建立健全我国网络综合治理体系研究”(20ZDA062);浙江省科技计划项目“智能司法开放创新平台开发及应用示范——基于人工智能的司法服务平台及示范应用”(2020C01060)阶段性成果;浙江省法学会2022年度法学研究课题“涉外企业合规风险控制研究”(2022NB14)成果。
摘 要:随着数据跨境成为国际贸易开展的必要途径,对跨越国界时触及国家安全与信息隐私的数据予以规制已成为当下热点问题。对中国而言,如何促进国内数据跨境规制体系与国际数字贸易协定的衔接,以平衡跨境数据自由流动与国家利益更是亟待解决的难题。基于中国维护数据主权的核心诉求,数据跨境规制中的国家监管权范围将直接影响一国的规制空间与政策安排,国家安全与公共政策例外关系到规制措施合法性并引出了数据跨境与隐私保护间微妙的关系。从WTO规则、贸易协定到数字经济协定的规则借鉴、删改与演变出发进行条文之间的比较,讨论我国数据跨境规制体系在保证国家主权利益的前提下符合数字经济协定规定的解释空间、修改可能与应对策略。As cross-border data flow has become an indispensable way for international trade, how to regulate data flow when it possibly threatens national interest and privacy security always gives rise to a heated discussion. As for China, how to promote the convergence of domestic cross-border data regulation system and international digital trade agreements, and then balance the free flow of cross-border data and national interests demands behind the regulatory measures is a difficult problem to be solved urgently. This paper studies and discusses the discrepancy between the rules of digital economic agreements and China’s cross-border data regulation framework from the right to regulate, exception clause of national security and public policy, according to China’s core demand for data sovereignty. Besides, it explores the revision and development of rules from WTO, free trade agreements to digital economic agreements, in order to probe into the interpretation space and modification possibilities for China’s cross-border data regulation system in line with the provisions of the digital economic agreements and building the cross-border data regulation paradigm led by China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.112.141