6串1并与3串2并检波器串连接方式对比分析  

Comparation of Geophone Connection Methods Between“6 series 1 parallel”and“3 series 2 parallel”

作　　者：聂明涛[1] 占春启 郎文立 梁顺利 张健宸 NIE Mingtao;ZHAN Chunqi;LANG Wenli;LIANG Shunli;ZHANG Jianchen(BGP Inc.,CNPC,Zhuozhou,Hebei 072750,China)

机构地区：[1]中国石油集团东方地球物理勘探有限责任公司,河北涿州072750

出　　处：《石油管材与仪器》2022年第6期81-84,90,共5页Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments

摘　　要：对6串2并检波器串改装成6串1并与3串2并两种不同内部连接方式的改装工作量和改装后的测试指标、组合效应进行了分析,并通过野外试验对两种连接方式所采集资料的品质进行了对比。综合以上研究得出,采用不同连接方式需要结合所在地区资料品质和信号强度做出合理选择,试验所在地区适合采用6串1并连接方式。研究内容和结论为检波器组合连接方式的选择提供了参考。The workload as well as the test indicators and combination affect of geophone string with two different internal connection methods of“6 series 1 parallel”and“3 series 2 parallel”modified from“6 series 2 parallel”are analyzed and compared.In addition,the data quality via the two connection methods was compared through field test.Based on the above research,data quality and signal-to-noise ratio of the work area should be considered to select reasonable connection methods.The area where the test is conducted is suitable for“6 series 1 parallel”.The research content and conclusions provide an important reference for the selection of the geophone combination connection mode.

关 键 词：检波器串 连接方式 串并联 信噪比 

分 类 号：P631.436[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]