检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭超[1] Peng Chao(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu,610041,Sichuan,China)
机构地区:[1]西南民族大学,四川成都610041
出 处:《民族学刊》2022年第7期94-100,148,共8页Journal of Ethnology
基 金:西南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项“社会变革之中的身份意识——20世纪巴蜀文学研究”(2020SZDD03)阶段性成果。
摘 要:被认为是地球最后一块绿地的藏地,不仅是当代文学中“他者”与“我者”共同的“故乡”所在地,也具有相同的“悬置性”感受。这种“在而不属于”的生命体验是不同空间文化间隔性的表现,即藏地寻梦的幻灭与藏地故乡书写中的反现代性。当代藏地情结以地方性视野表现了当代中国的“现代性焦虑”文化困局。本文通过梳理中国近百年来的现代化进程,指出现代性焦虑的发生与“激进现代化”以及后现代化文化之间的密切内在关联,认为对当代文学中藏地情结与现代性焦虑的关系研究的现实性意义在于通过溯源当代藏地情结的缘起,为当代中国文化建设困局把脉问诊,指出如何完善现代性的未来方向。Contemporary China,as a modernizing country,has been always on the road of reform. In this continuous historical process of modernization,people’s attitude towards it is changing— from questioning to accepting and then to requestioning — which arguably shows people’s profound anxiety about modernity. Findings demonstrate the Tibetan complex in contemporary Tibetan literature typically reflects this cultural phenomenon. There are two main evolution threads for contemporary Tibetan literature narrative: one is the ardent pursuit of modernization,and the other is on the opposite,i. e. an “anti-modernity”reconstruction of the homeland,which is embodied in the“hanging onto”the homeland life experience in contemporary Tibetan literature.The concept of “homeland”in the writings about the Tibetan homeland,which is derived from the experience of “hanging”life,appears to be a combination of the realistic experience of physical geography and the poetic imagination of history and culture. This concept of “homeland”looks to be a reshaping of history and culture by human beings pressured by modern life,which at the same time beautifies history and culture. This can be seen from the paradoxes of the aesthetic writing about homeland in contemporary Tibetan literary creations and the pragmatic choice of writers’ realistic existence. What the former expresses is against modern civilization,while the latter could be considered an acceptance of modern civilization. That is to say,writing about one’s homeland in a city is a kind of writing by“urban wanderers”. This wandering is not only physical but more importantly,seems to indicate a spiritual level of homelessness,which reflects a cultural dilemma and modernity anxiety in the modernization process of contemporary China.China’s acceptance of“modernity”can arguably be traced back to the late Qing Dynasty. From the initial “admiration and following”to the current “questioning and criticism”,it has always been “radical”. “Radical
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249