社科法学如何处理规范性问题?兼与雷磊教授商榷  

How Does Law and Social Science Deal with Normative Issues?A Discussion with Professor Lei Lei

作　　者：吴义龙[1] Wu Yilong

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2022年第6期1579-1598,共20页Peking University Law Journal

摘　　要：在法学研究中,人们无法从“是”推出“应当”这一“休谟问题”在法学研究中的具体体现,便是经验研究能否以及如何处理法的规范性问题。无论从封闭体系还是开放体系的角度回答这一问题,法教义学都面临诸多困境,其根源在于证立逻辑以及形式化和非语境的局限。社科法学从因果解释角度回答这一问题且直面“休谟问题”:价值是客观的主体性事实;可以借助问题和对问题的成功解决跨越从“是”到“应当”的鸿沟。在这一过程中,“价值判断”至关重要。社科法学的回答,是基于方法论上“猜测-反驳”的演绎假设的检验逻辑。在这一启示下,法教义学和社科法学的合作有了新视角:社科法学的相对优势在于能较好应对不确定性情形下的各种问题从而形成规范;法教义学的相对优势则体现于在相对确定的语境下协调各种规范使之体系化以便应对各种具体案件。In legal research,the“Problem of Induction”raised by Davide Hume,which means it is impossible to deduce“ought to be”from“is”,is embodied in the the question whether and how empirical research can deal with the normativity of law.From either the closed system or open system perspective,legal dogmatics is facing several dilemmas,rooted in the logic of proving and the limitations of formalization and non-contextualism behind it.Law and social sciences answers this question from the perspective of causal explanation and responds to the Problem of Induction.In the process of problem-solving,“value judgment”is crucial,which is widely misunderstood in academic community.The capacity of law and social sciencesis based on the verification logic of deductive hypothesis of the“hypothesis and refutation”methodology.Enlightenment of law and social sciences methodology enables new perspective of cooperation between legal dogmatics and social sciences.Law and social sciences has the comparative advantage of handling various problems under uncertain circumstances and forming normative rules;legal dogmatics has the comparative advantage of coordinating normative rules and systematizing them,and thus to resolve specific cases under contexts with certainty.

关 键 词：社科法学 法的规范性 因果规律 价值判断 检验逻辑 

分 类 号：D90-052[政治法律—法学理论]