检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者: HEIN Khaing(Center for Southeast Asian Studies,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian;Research School for Southeast Asian Studies,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian)
机构地区:[1]厦门大学东南亚研究中心,福建厦门361005 [2]厦门大学南洋研究院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《南洋问题研究》2022年第4期79-92,共14页Southeast Asian Affairs
基 金:国家社科基金冷门绝学研究专项“缅甸佤邦史研究”(22VJXG003)。
摘 要:缅甸的政治转型进程表明,只有将观察的角度从客观的外在条件转移到行动者们的“意义制造”过程,才能全面理解当前缅甸政治的演变。缅甸2019年修宪与2020年大选虽然没有对军方的权力产生任何实质性的影响,但却引发了缅甸近10年来最严重的政治动荡,即2021年军人接管国家政权。原因在于,这两起事件在其“表演”过程中产生了远超其事件本身的戏剧性意义,使缅甸军方感受到严重的威胁,并深刻地破坏了民盟与军方的关系,最终促使军方以“接管权力”的方式来解决这场危机。Myanmar’s political transition in 2021 shows that it can be fully understood only by shifting the focus from objective external conditions to actors’meaning-making processes.This article points out that although Myanmar’s 2019 constitutional amending and 2020 general election did not produce any substantive results,they have triggered the most serious political turmoil in Myanmar in the past 10 years.The reason is that the two events produced a dramatic significance far beyond the events themselves in the course of its performance,which made the Myanmar military feel a serious threat and deeply damaged the relationship between the NLD and the military,and finally prompted the military“take-over of power”in order to resolve this crisis.The theoretical innovation of this article is to point out that there is a“re-coding process”between cultural structure and action,and extracts the framing binary codes and competitive binary codes of Myanmar’s political culture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145