检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康秋凤 郭海燕[1] 陈金碰 KANG Qiufeng;GUO Haiyan;CHEN Jinpeng(Department of Endocrinology,Quanzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Quanzhou,Fujian Province,362000 China)
出 处:《糖尿病新世界》2022年第21期125-127,131,共4页Diabetes New World Magazine
摘 要:目的 探究全程健康教育模式在糖尿病护理干预中的效果。方法 选择2020年5月—2022年5月泉州市中医院收治的196例糖尿病患者为研究对象,采用数表法分为对照组与观察组,每组98例,前者落实常规护理模式,后者落实全程健康教育模式,对两组临床指标进行分析,同时检验两组健康知识掌握情况及护理认可度。结果 统计观察组空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖和糖化血红蛋白分别为(5.76±1.02)mmol/L、(8.23±1.17)mmol/L、(7.02±0.28)%,较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组健康知识掌握度中饮食健康、运动健康、用药方式和血糖监测评分分别是(21.45±1.20)分、(20.84±2.21)分、(23.21±1.26)分、(21.37±1.26)分,护理认可度达到95.92%(94例),均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 全程健康教育模式用于糖尿病护理干预对于控制患者血糖指标具有积极作用,并能够提升患者健康知识掌握度,获得患者的认可。Objective To investigate the effect of the whole health education model in the nursing intervention of diabetes.Methods 196 diabetic patients admitted to Quanzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020to May 2022 were selected as the study subjects. The numerical table method was used to divide the control group and the observation group, with 98 cases in each group. The former implemented the conventional care model and the latter implemented the whole health education model, and the clinical indicators of the two groups were analyzed. The health knowledge mastery and nursing recognition of the two groups were also examined.Results The fasting blood glucose, 2 h post-meal blood glucose and HBA1c in the observation group were(5.76±1.02) mmol/L,(8.23±1.17)mmol/L and(7.02±0.28) %, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The scores of diet health, exercise health, medication methods and blood glucose monitoring in the observation group were(21.45±1.20) points,(20.84±2.21) points,(23.21±1.26) points and(21.37±1.26)points, respectively, and the nursing recognition reached 95.92%(94 cases), all higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The whole health education model used for diabetes care intervention has a positive effect on controlling patients’ blood glucose index. It can also improve the degree of health knowledge mastery of patients, which is recognized by patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28