RCEP背景下中国-东盟商事仲裁承认与执行机制省察与调适革新  

Recognition and Enforcement of China-ASEAN Commercial Arbitration in the Context of RCEP Reflection and Adaptation of Mechanisms

作　　者：蒋慧[1] Jiang Hui(Law School,Guangxi University for Nationalities,Nanning Guangxi 530000)

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院,广西南宁530000

出　　处：《政法论丛》2022年第6期97-109,共13页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：广西社科基金项目“广西自由贸易试验区建设法律问题研究”(项目号:20BFX004);广西高等学校高水平创新团队“东盟民商法研究创新团队”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：承认与执行是国际商事仲裁领域核心问题,赋予了仲裁裁决真正的“生命力”。在《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》背景下,国际仲裁归于单一国家法律秩序的主张以及仲裁的威斯特伐利亚模式已趋于落伍,实现以合作主义与共同繁荣原则为理论转向是时代之义。深刻反思仲裁自我发展及与外向接轨的掣肘,我国仍存在仲裁裁决籍属判定“双重标准”、仲裁送达示范性规则阙如、国内司法审查规定不足等机制困境。基于本土化特色的法律趋同为改革提供了辩证路径,通过调整《民事诉讼法》对仲裁承认与执行的规定、制定规范仲裁送达指导办法、建立不予执行仲裁裁决上诉机制等路径有助于纾解既有困境,为《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》的实施提供良好保障。Recognition and enforcement are the core issues in the field of international commercial arbitration, which give real “vitality” to arbitral awards. In the context of RCEP, the claim that international arbitration belongs to a single national legal order and the Westphalian model of arbitration tend to be outdated. It is the sense of The Times to realize the theoretical transformation guided by the principle of cooperation and common prosperity. Review the arbitration mechanism, there are still some institutional dilemmas in China, such as “double standard” in adjudication of membership in arbitration awards, absence of demonstrative rules for arbitration service, and insufficient provisions for domestic judicial review. The law convergence based on local characteristics provides a dialectical path for reform. Adjusting the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law on the recognition and enforcement of arbitration, formulating guiding measures to regulate the service of arbitration, and establishing an appeal mechanism for non-enforcement arbitral awards will help to relieve the existing difficulties and provide a good guarantee for the implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 承认与执行合作主义 司法拟制 法律趋同化 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]