民事裁判文书中“本院认为”的效力与界限  

The Effect and Limit of“Court Deems”in Civil Judgment Documents

作　　者：方向[1] Fang Xiang(School of Culture and Law,Anhui Business College,Wuhu Anhui 241002)

机构地区：[1]安徽商贸职业技术学院文化与法律学院,安徽芜湖241002

出　　处：《安徽商贸职业技术学院学报》2022年第4期45-49,共5页Journal of Anhui Business College

摘　　要：民事裁判文书中的“本院认为”是裁判者就案件事实认定及裁判理由所发表的评论性意见,旨在构建裁判主文的合法性和说服力。“本院认为”不是判项本身,不得作为执行依据。当事人仅对“本院认为”不服的,有权提出上诉,但其诉的利益不足以引发再审程序。生效裁判中的“本院认为”所认定的事实为预决事实,具有相对免证效力,可由相反证据予以推翻。后案裁判中对此宜作证据上评判,从而予以纠正。“Court deems”in civil judgment documents is a commentary made by the judge on the determination of the facts of the case and the reasons for the judgment,which aims to build the legitimacy and persuasion of the main body of the judgment.“Court deems”is not the judgment itself,and should not be used as the basis for enforcement.If the parties are only dissatisfied with“court deems”,they have the right to appeal,but the interests of their appeal are not enough to trigger the retrial procedure.In the effective judgment,the facts determined by“court deems”are pre-determined facts,which have the effect of relative exemption from evidence,and can be overturned by contrary evidence.This should be judged on the evidence in the subsequent judgment,so as to be corrected.

关 键 词：本院认为 既判力 执行力 相对免证事实 

分 类 号：D926.13[政治法律—法学]