检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴铃铃 陈斌彬[1] WU Ling-ling;CHEN Bin-bin(School of Law,Huaqiao University,Xiamen 361021,China)
出 处:《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第6期38-42,50,共6页Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(20BFX152)。
摘 要:在突发的应急状态下,为维护重大公共利益,国家对个人信息权益施行克减措施具有正当性基础。国家在应急状态下施行的个人信息权益克减措施在信息收集、使用和公开3个阶段暴露出收集主体泛化、信息“再利用”失范和信息披露过度的现实弊端,这些弊端源自于政府实施克减措施边界的模糊。为克服这些弊端,我国应树立“核心权利不可克减”的谦抑型理念,遵循相称性原则,分场景概括式地授权信息收集主体,引入信息退出机制和推行信息披露内容去识别化等具体因应措施,以防范国家机关滥用应激性措施,维护公民核心权利。In the state of emergency,in order to safeguard major public interests,it is understandable that a country should take measures to reduce personal information rights and interests.However,with the promotion of normalization of COVID-19 prevention and control,the implementation of these derogation measures in China has gradually exposed three problems,namely,the generalization of the subjects of collection,the anomie of information“Reuse”and the excessive disclosure of information.All these problems are derived from the fuzzy boundary of government s implementation of reduction measures.Therefore,in order to overcome these drawbacks,China should introduce the modest concept of“Irreducible Core Rights”,follow the principle of proportionality,authorize the subject of information collection in a generalized way according to different situations,introduce the information“Exit”mechanism and implement the“Deidentification”of information disclosure contents,so as to achieve a good balance between the prevention and control measures against the abuse of stress by state organs and the maintenance of citizens core rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33