检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭勇[1] 阳富强[1] GUO Yong;YANG Fu-qiang(School of Environment and Safety engineering,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350116,Fujian,China)
机构地区:[1]福州大学环境与安全工程学院,福建福州350116
出 处:《矿冶工程》2022年第6期13-17,共5页Mining and Metallurgical Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51874100)。
摘 要:在构建硫化矿山炸药自爆危险性评价体系的基础上,运用博弈论(GT)协同层次分析法(AHP)所得主观权重和熵值法所得客观权重来获得综合权重,以提高指标权重的精确性;将灰色关联分析法(GRA)与逼近于理想解的排序法(TOPSIS)相结合应用于硫化矿山炸药自爆危险性评价。以国内典型硫化矿山为例,运用GRA-TOPSIS评价模型对炸药自爆危险性展开评价,所得评价结果与矿山实际情况相符。对比了GRA-TOPSIS评价模型与单独使用TOPSIS、GRA模型以及其他模型的评价结果,证明了GRA-TOPSIS模型的准确性与优越性。An evaluation system was established for self-explosion risk of the explosives in sulfide mines.Then,objective weights were derived by using the game theory(GT)in combination with the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP),and subjective weights were derived from the entropy value method,so as to improve the accuracy of comprehensive weights.The gray correlation analysis(GRA)in combination with technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution(TOPSIS)was applied to evaluate self-explosion risk of the explosives in sulfide mines.Based on the research,some typical sulfide mines in China were taken as examples and self-explosion risk of the explosives was evaluated for the mines by using the established GRA-TOPSIS model,and the evaluation results are consistent with the actual situation of these mines.Based on the comparison of the evaluation results obtained from GRA-TOPSIS model,TOPSIS model,GRA model and other models,it is proven that the GRA-TOPSIS model is superior in accuracy.
关 键 词:硫化矿山 炸药自爆 危险性评价 博弈论 GRA-TOPSIS模型
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229