检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Ming Li Shuai-Yi Wang Jing-Wei Xiao
出 处:《Chinese Journal of Traumatology》2022年第6期345-352,共8页中华创伤杂志(英文版)
摘 要:Purpose:To compare the stability of the posterior anatomic self-locking plate(PASP)with two types of popular reconstruction plate fixation,i.e.double reconstruction plate(DRP)and cross reconstruction plate(CRP),and to explore the influence of sitting and turning right/left on implants.Methods:PASP,DRP and CRP were assembled on a finite element model of both-column fractures of the left acetabulum.A load of 600 N and a torque of 8 N·m were loaded on the S1 vertebral body to detect the change of stress and displacement when sitting and turning right/left.Results:The peak stress and displacement of the three kinds of fixation methods under all loading conditions were CRP>DRP>PASP.The peak stress and displacement of PASP are 313.5 MPa and 1.15 mm respectively when turning right;and the minimal was 234.0 Mpa and 0.619 mm when turning left.Conclusion:PASP can provide higher stability than DRP and CRP for both-column acetabular fractures.The rational movement after posterior DRP and PASP fixation for acetabular fracture is to turn to the ipsilateral side,which can avoid implant failure.
关 键 词:Acetabular fractures Internal fixation Posterior anatomic self-locking plate(PASP) BIOMECHANICS Stability
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.205