夏热冬冷地区农宅冬季清洁采暖方案对比分析  

Comparative analysis of clean heating schemes for rural houses in winter in hot summer and cold winter areas

作　　者：张雨秋 金星[1] 张嵩[1] 周欣 石邢 Zhang Yuqiu;Jin Xing;Zhang Song;Zhou Xin;Shi Xing(School of Architecture,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,China;College of Architecture and Urban Planning,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)

机构地区：[1]东南大学建筑学院,江苏南京210096 [2]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,上海200092

出　　处：《山西建筑》2023年第2期21-24,28,共5页Shanxi Architecture

基　　金：“十三五”国家重点研发计划课题(2020YFC1522304)。

摘　　要：以浙江省一户典型农宅作为研究对象,首先基于实际情况确定了六种清洁采暖方案,分别为壁挂式空气源热泵、立式空气源热泵、电辐射暖炉/桌、远红外电暖气、生物质颗粒采暖炉和洁净型煤采暖炉。而后重点分析了这六种清洁采暖方案的经济性、污染物排放特性以及适宜性。研究结果表明,空气源热泵与生物质颗粒采暖炉在经济性上具有明显的优势。空气源热泵在污染物排放方面表现较好,而生物质颗粒采暖炉则是使用零碳排放燃料,两者均采用清洁性能源进行供暖,有利于清洁减排的可持续性目标的实现,是值得在我国南方夏热冬冷地区推广的采暖方案。This paper takes a typical farm house in Zhejiang Province as the research object.Firstly,six clean heating schemes are determined based on the actual situation,including wall mounted air source heat pump,vertical air source heat pump,electric radiant heater/table,far-infrared electric heating,biomass particle heating furnace and clean briquette heating furnace.Then it focuses on the economy,pollutant emission characteristics and suitability of the six clean heating schemes.The results show that air source heat pump and biomass particle heating furnace have obvious advantages in economy.Air source heat pump performs well in pollutant emission,while biomass particle heating furnace uses zero carbon emission fuel.Both of them use clean energy for heating,which is conducive to the realization of the sustainability goal of clean emission reduction.It is a heating scheme worthy of promotion in hot summer and cold winter areas in South China.

关 键 词：清洁采暖 夏热冬冷地区 农宅 经济性 污染物排放 

分 类 号：TU832[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]