检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Nicola Dunham
机构地区:[1]University of Canterbury,Christchurch,New Zealand
出 处:《US-China Education Review(A)》2022年第5期156-165,共10页美中教育评论(A)
摘 要:This research casts an academic literacies gaze on early childhood preservice teacher engagement with critical policy analysis.Engaging critically with policy analysis,involves attending to macro and micro political and practice ramifications.It is acknowledged that critical thinking and critical analysis do not come easily to students and the use of frameworks can assist in scaffolding such complex literacies practices.This case study examines the application of the Affirmative Discourse Intervention model as a guiding framework to inform early childhood pre-service teacher engagement with critical policy analysis.A content analysis methodology was used involving the thematic analysis of secondary data in the form of student-completed ADI frameworks.The findings show the framework helped students to move past an initial“glance”over the document to a more sustained engagement with it.This sustained engagement supports the notion of critical policy analysis requiring a reading and(re)reading,which is more than just reading multiple times but looking at what is presented or being said from multiple standpoints.This research is important as policy analysis within professional discourse is a call for action,for agency and autonomy to question,challenge,and an opportunity to exert influence.Uncritical engagement with policy is the opposite.It is a form of inaction,passivity,a taking what is given as true and the way things should and will be.
关 键 词:affirmative discourse intervention early childhood education academic literacies policy analysis pre-service teachers
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249