检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Lori Krider Geoff Kramer Bruce Wilson Joseph Magner William Lazarus Brad Hansen John Nieber
机构地区:[1]Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering,(BBE)University of Minnesota(UMN),St.Paul,MN 55108,USA [2]Former graduate students at BBE-UMN [3]Department of Applied Economics,University of MN,St.Paul,MN,55106,USA [4]Retired Scientist-BBE-UMN
出 处:《Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering(B)》2022年第6期229-240,共12页环境科学与工程(B)
摘 要:The Minnesota Nutrient Management Strategy has identified waters with the highest amounts of nutrients that could potentially enter the Mississippi River.Mower County contains the headwaters of the Cedar River Basin,a large nutrient loading basin in the upper Mississippi River Basin.Joint efforts of the UMN(University of Minnesota),the Nature Conservancy,and Mower County,MN implemented alternative agricultural ditch designs to improve water management.Designs consisted of a TSD(Two-Stage Ditch),a rock trench,a rock inlet,and two in-ditch linear treatment systems.These features were implemented to increase ditch stability and to reduce the loading of sediment and nutrients.Important costs were the possible removal of productive ag-land,construction costs,and the break-even discount(interest)rates.Benefits included lower maintenance cost,reduced sediment and phosphorus loads with more stable ditches,and enhanced removal of NO_(3)-N(Nitrate-Nitrogen).Results suggest costs of the TSD construction may be supplemented with subsidies to break-even with conventional ditch design costs.Subsidies based on NO_(3)-N removal show the TSD compares well to other NO_(3)-N best management practices.The break-even NO_(3)-N removal costs vary greatly but are lowest when the floodplain bench is inundated for longer time periods and when the discount rate,cleanout interval of the conventional design,and construction costs of the TSD are low.
关 键 词:Ag-drainage-best management practices economic analysis NO_(3)-N removal
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.71.225