价值争论中的“理性-中立-客观”标准辨析  

An Analysis on the Standard of “Rationality-Neutrality-Objectiveness” in Value Disputes

作　　者：刘清平[1,2] LIU Qingping(School of Film and Television,Wuhan College of Communication;Fudan Institute of Advanced Study in Social Sciences,Fudan University)

机构地区：[1]武汉传媒学院人文学院 [2]复旦大学社会科学高等研究院

出　　处：《当代中国价值观研究》2022年第2期5-15,共11页Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values

摘　　要：人们在价值争论中经常诉诸“理性—中立—客观”的标准,用以评判各种认知或论说是否正确,甚至评判各种实践行为是否正当。其实,只有非认知价值中立才是人们在价值争论中形成正确知识的决定性因素,“理性”只是帮助正确知识具有清晰逻辑体系的有效工具,“客观”则是评判认知是否符合事实的重要标准之一。同时,它们在实践维度上也具有不同的含义,发挥着不同的作用,需要仔细辨析,不可在价值争论中随意将其混为一谈。People often resort to the standard of“rationality-neutrality-objectiveness”in value disputes to judge whether various cognitions or arguments are correct or not,and even whether various practical acts are justified or not.However,only non-cognitive value neutrality is the decisive factor for people to form correct knowledge in value disputes.Rationality is merely an effective tool to help correct knowledge have a clear logical system,and objectivity is rather one of the important criteria for judging whether cognition conforms to facts.Meanwhile,all of the three also have different meanings in the practical dimension and play different roles,which need to be carefully distinguished and not arbitrarily mixed up in value disputes.

关 键 词：价值争论 中立 理性 客观 需要 

分 类 号：B018[哲学宗教—哲学理论]