投资仲裁法律适用中投资者行为与东道国措施的关系分析  

Analysis of the Relationship between Investor Behavior and Host State Measures in the Application of Investment Arbitration Law

作　　者：孙南申[1,2] Sun Nanshen

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院 [2]澳门科技大学,中国澳门

出　　处：《南大法学》2023年第1期21-33,共13页NanJing University Law Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“国际投资争端解决程序的保障机制研究”(项目编号:17BFX145)成果。

摘　　要：在东道国对投资者行为采取限制措施而产生的国际投资争端的法律纠纷中,投资者对东道国提出仲裁请求,东道国则提出“投资行为违法”抗辩,其实质是投资争端中责任归属问题处理的法律适用。投资仲裁中对责任归属如何确定,不仅取决于投资者行为与东道国措施之间是否存在因果关系,而且涉及东道国措施与条约义务及投资损失的关系,同时需要分析违法投资行为对投资仲裁请求的不利影响。理论上,应区分“投资产生的不合法”与“投资履行的不合法”,并允许东道国依据国内法对履行中的不合法行为进行制裁。In the legal dispute of international investment caused by host state restrictive measures on investor behavior,when investor makes arbitration request against host state,the latter would claim the defense of“illegal investment behavior”,which is in essence the allocation of liability in the investment dispute.How to determine the liability in investment arbitration not only depends on whether there is a causal relationship between the investor behavior and the host state measures,but also involves the relationship between the host state measures and treaty obligations and investment losses.At the same time,it is necessary to analyze the adverse impact of illegal investment behavior on the investment arbitration claim.Theoretically,a distinction should be made between“illegality of investment per se”and“illegality of investment performance”,and the host state should be allowed to impose sanctions on illegality of performance according to its domestic laws.

关 键 词：投资仲裁 投资者行为 东道国措施 东道国抗辩 法律适用 

分 类 号：D996.4[政治法律—经济法学]