检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张莉莉[1] 阮腾飞 Zhang Li-li;Ruan Teng-fei
机构地区:[1]河海大学法学院
出 处:《江苏警官学院学报》2022年第6期29-35,共7页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
基 金:2020年度江苏省社科基金重点项目“江苏打造国际一流法治化营商环境实证研究”(20ZLA002)。
摘 要:在数字经济时代,随着网络运营商对数据信息更加深入地挖掘和利用,个人数据信息被侵害的情况大量出现。在现行知情-同意模式的框架下,信息主体对其权利的主张往往依靠司法途径,而诉讼的低效又强化了网络运营商对数据信息处理的绝对控制权,由此使个人数据信息权利的行使沦为空谈。以当事双方权利结构错配的现实为基础,通过采取提高司法机关对信息主体维权的救济能力、为网络运营商引入信义义务、建立动态化监督评估机制等措施,可以实现双方权利义务的再平衡,从而为破除知情-同意模式下个人数据信息保护的困境提供较为可行的解决路径。In the era of digital economy, as network operators dig and utilize data information more deeply,personal data information is violated in large numbers. Under the current framework of informed consent mode, information subjects often rely on judicial channels to claim their rights, and the low efficiency of litigation strengthens the absolute control of network operators over data information processing, thus making the exercise of personal data information rights become empty talk. Based on the reality of the mismatch of the rights structure of both parties, the re-balance of the rights and obligations of both parties can be realized by taking measures such as improving the relief ability of judicial organs for the rights protection of information subjects, introducing fiduciary-duty for network operators, and establishing a dynamic supervision and evaluation mechanism, so as to provide a feasible solution for breaking the dilemma of personal data information protection under the informed consent mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43