影响焦虑、学科地位与空间竞争——布尔迪厄对阿尔都塞主义的持久敌视  

Influence Anxiety, Disciplinary Status, and Competition in Academic Space——Pierre Bourdieu’s Enduring Hostility to Althusserism

作　　者：李钧鹏 许松影 Li Junpeng;Xu Songying(School of Sociology,Center for Hubei Social Development and Social Policy Studies,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学社会学院、湖北省社会发展与社会政策研究中心,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第1期87-107,共21页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“知识社会学的学术脉络与体系重建研究”(18BSH014)。

摘　　要：布尔迪厄在超过30年的时间中持久地敌视阿尔都塞主义,但学术界却不断发现其社会学与阿尔都塞主义的相似之处。这种矛盾除了思想本身的差别,还和以下三个原因有关:首先,布尔迪厄对源于阿尔都塞和其他评论者的影响产生焦虑感,而批判态度是其消解焦虑的方式;其次,针对阿尔都塞主义对普通人和社会学所展现的优越感,布尔迪厄从道德和政治角度提出批判;再次,由于阿尔都塞主义从马克思主义立场出发贬低社会学,却在同一个学术空间中展开相似研究,且对布尔迪厄本人提出批评,因此,布尔迪厄从阿尔都塞主义的马克思主义身份认同入手,提出阿尔都塞主义者社会学素养不足等批评。Bourdieu held hostility towards Althusserism for more than 30 years, whereas scholars have continued to find parallels between his sociology and Althusserism. This seeming contradiction is related to three reasons beyond theoretical disagreement. First, Bourdieu’s critical attitude is his way of dissipating the anxiety of influences originated from Althusser and other commentators. Second, in response to the Althusserian sense of superiority over common people and sociology, Bourdieu offers a critique from the perspective of morality and politics. Third, since Althusserism disparages sociology from a Marxist position while conducts similar research in the same academic space, and criticizes Bourdieu himself, Bourdieu puts forward such criticisms as Althusserians’ lack of sociological literacy from the Marxist identity of Althusserism.

关 键 词：知识社会学 社会理论 布尔迪厄 阿尔都塞 

分 类 号：C91[经济管理]