关于经济学制度研究中“去社会性”问题的思考  

Some Thoughts on the Question of “De-Sociality” in Economic Research on Institutions

作　　者：郭艳茹[1] 陈言[2] Guo Yanru;Chen Yan(School of International Trade and Economics,Shandong University of Finance and Economics,Jinan 250014,P.R.China;Center for Economic Research,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]山东财经大学国际经贸学院,济南250014 [2]山东大学经济研究院,济南250100

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第1期160-170,共11页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“经济高质量发展阶段的资源错配影响要素收入分配的机制研究”(21BJL034)。

摘　　要：新古典运动后,经济学的制度研究呈现出强烈的“去社会性”特征。新制度经济学结合了新古典经济学的个人主义和社会学的功能主义,在个人主义基础上对制度进行了还原处理,把制度与个体相对应,同时对制度及其变迁进行了功能主义诠释,预设了制度有效性,从而导致制度的“社会性”被淡化。新制度经济学家以及后继的主流经济学家在制度研究上对还原主义、功能主义具有严重的路径依赖,致使经济学制度研究的“去社会性”程度不断加深。新世纪全球日益加剧的结构性冲突,使经济学制度研究面临理论困境:一是个人主义下持续还原所形成的研究工具、研究对象微化和结构性冲突之间的不协调;二是功能主义隐含的“市场力量会引导全球融合”的价值判断与全球冲突加剧的事实之间的矛盾。中国经济学的制度研究需要跳出还原主义和功能主义局限,基于中国历史和现实经验来构建理论诠释实践,发展中国特色哲学社会科学,使理论研究真正服务于经济社会发展。After the neoclassical movement in economics, the new institutional economics is a combination of New Classical Individualism and Sociological Functionalism, and its study on institutions has strong “De-Social” features, which are manifested by two parts: 1) the excessive reduction and abstraction on individual social attributes and complexity of institutions under individualism(reductionism);2) the weakening of presuppositions on institutions’ validity and facts on social conflicts under functionalism. When studying institutions, the new institutional economics and its subsequent mainstream economists have formed severe path dependence on reductionism, which results in a great degree of De-Sociality in institutional research. When entering into 21th century, the increasingly structural conflict all over the world generates a theoretical dilemma for economic research on institutions: 1) the inharmony between the continuous reduction of research tools, miniaturization on research object under the methodology of individualism(reductionism) and structural conflicts in macro world;2) the contradiction between the value judgment implied by functionalism that “market forces will lead to global integration” and the fact that global conflicts have intensified. In order to understand above structural conflicts, institutional research in economics needs to jump out of the limitation of reductionism and functionalism, and introspect the social attributes on institutional research. Chinese economists should interpret the institutional changes and economic growth during the transition period based on China’s unique institutional facts, and develop the Institutional Economics with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：新制度经济学 个人主义 功能主义 还原主义 去社会性 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学]