习见中求是反正——袁传璋先生《论裴骃“〈史记集解〉八十卷”系合本子注本》读后  

Thoughts on the Paper of Mr.Yuan Chuanzhang’s On Pei Yin’s Eighty Volumes of the Collection Interpretation of Historical Records as a Various Annotations to the Original Text

作　　者：任刚[1] REN Gang(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Xi'an University of Engineering,Xi'an 710048,China)

机构地区：[1]西安工程大学人文学院,西安710048

出　　处：《渭南师范学院学报》2022年第12期21-27,共7页Journal of Weinan Normal University

基　　金：教育部西部和边疆地区规划基金项目:非文字材料对《史记》影响的研究(19XJA751007)。

摘　　要：《文学遗产》2022年第1期卷首刊发了袁传璋先生的新作《论裴骃“〈史记集解〉八十卷”系合本子注本》。文章有力地论证了裴骃《史记集解》施注方式为“合本子注”,清理了自清儒到当代“三家注原先都各自单行……《隋书·经籍志》和《唐书·经籍志》著录《史记集解》八十卷”这一流行两三百年观点的致误所在。文章信息量大,给人启发良多。文章从积累有年多创获、《史记》版本源流、“《史记集解》八十卷”的误称误传及其缘由、文献功底深厚四方面,评价了袁先生此文中表现出来的实事求是精神。The first issue of Literary Heritage in 2022 published Mr.Yuan Chuanzhang’s paper,On Pei Yin’s Eighty Volumes of the Collection Interpretation of Historical Records as a Various Annotations to the Original Text.The paper forcefully demonstrates that the annotation method of Pei Yin’s Collection Interpretation of Historical Records is Various Annotations to the Original Text,and clears up the mistake of the popular view that“Notes of Three Scholars in Historical Records were originally annotated respectively for two or three hundred years from the Qing Dynasty to contemporary times”.The paper is informative and enlightening.This paper evaluates Mr.Yuan’s spirit of seeking truth from facts in his paper from four aspects:years of achievements,the origin and development of the edition of Historical Records,the misnomer and misinformation of 80 Volumes of the Collection of Historical Records and its causes,and profound literature foundation.

关 键 词：袁传璋 《史记集解》 “合本子注” 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]