检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雨 周彬彬[1] ZHANG Yu;ZHOU Bin-bin(School of Civil and Commercial Law,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan,250000,China)
机构地区:[1]山东政法学院民商法学院,山东济南250000
出 处:《南京中医药大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第1期54-62,共9页Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(20YJC820066)。
摘 要:针对疫苗接种损害问题,目前我国提供两种救济路径,疫苗接种异常反应适用行政补偿制度,非异常反应则可以适用民事侵权获得赔偿。但就民事赔偿制度而言,通过对司法案例的统计分析,会发现其在实际运用中存在诸多缺陷,比如与行政救济制度衔接不畅、因果关系鉴定难、证明责任分配不合理、精神损害补偿标准不一等。因此需要进一步健全疫苗接种损害赔偿制度,通过对既存的问题提出完善建议,旨在使受害方能够得到充分救济,从而构建我国良好的医疗秩序。In terms of the problem of vaccination damage, China has currently provided two relief paths. For abnormal reactions of vaccination, administrative compensation system is applicable, while for non abnormal reactions, civil infringement can be applied to obtain compensation. However, as for the civil compensation system, through the statistical analysis of judicial cases, it can be found that there are many defects in its practical application, such as poor connection with the administrative relief system, difficult identification of causality, unreasonable distribution of burden of proof, and different compensation standards for mental damage. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the vaccination damage compensation system, and put forward improvement suggestions on the existing problems, so as to enable the injured party to receive adequate relief, thus building a good medical order in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147