检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王振硕 WANG Zhenshuo(Law School,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350
出 处:《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》2022年第6期63-68,共6页Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
摘 要:由于故意伤害罪对暴力侵害行为存在规制漏洞,以及寻衅滋事罪的保护法益为社会秩序而非人身安全,故当前立法对个体暴力侵害行为的规制仍存在不足。以日本立法为参照,认为增设暴行罪并加以规范适用是有效完善公民人身权利保障的刑事法治方案。暴行罪的立法,主要涉及罪名、罪状设计和法定刑配置;暴行罪的规范适用,主要涉及构成要件释义、本罪与他罪的界分以及本罪与行政违法的界分。Since the crime of intentional injury has loopholes in the regulation of violent acts and the crime of provocation protects the legal interest of social order rather than personal safety, the current legislation is still inadequate in regulating individual violent acts. Taking the Japanese legislation as a reference, we believe that the creation and regulation of the crime of atrocity is an effective solution to improve the protection of citizens’ personal rights under the criminal law. The legislation of the crime of atrocity is mainly related to the name of the crime, the design of the crime and the configuration of the legal penalty. The regulation and application of the crime of atrocity is mainly related to the interpretation of the constituent elements, the distinction between this crime and other crimes, and the distinction between this crime and administrative violations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7