刑事责任调和性浅析  

Analysis on the Conciliation of Criminal Liability

作　　者：张文聪 张继钢 ZHANG Wen-cong;ZHANG Ji-gang(School of Law and Politics,Guangdong Ocean University,Zhanjiang,Guangdong 524088)

机构地区：[1]广东海洋大学法政学院,广东湛江524088

出　　处：《张家口职业技术学院学报》2022年第3期1-3,10,共4页Journal of Zhangjiakou Vocational and Technical College

基　　金：广东海洋大学博士启动费资助项目“广东生态文明的刑事司法保护研究”(项目编号:R19065)的研究成果。

摘　　要：刑事责任评价犯罪行为并说明发动制裁的正当性,在刑法指控失灵或其他法律局限性阻碍司法实践时,刑事责任需要临时评估犯罪行为并且调和其中所蕴含的价值关切冲突,其中主要包括人权诉求与刑罚适用、民众常识与刑罚适用以及法律局限性与社会新情势这三对冲突;进而通过凝结着调适结果的司法衡平实现自身。Criminal responsibility evaluates criminal behavior and explains the legitimacy of initiating sanctions. When criminal law charges fail or other legal limitations hinder judicial practice, criminal responsibility needs to temporarily evaluate criminal behavior and reconcile the value and concern conflicts contained therein, which mainly include the three conflicts between human rights demands and the application of penalties, common sense of the people and the application of penalties, as well as the limitations of the law and the new social situation;and then realize oneself through judicial balance that condenses the results of adjustment.

关 键 词：刑事责任 调和性 司法衡平 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]