机构地区:[1]蚌埠医学院第一附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科、安徽呼吸系病临床基础省级重点实验室,安徽蚌埠233004
出 处:《临床急诊杂志》2022年第12期863-869,共7页Journal of Clinical Emergency
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(No:81673791);安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(No:1804h08020287)。
摘 要:目的:分析不同感染解剖来源、组织灌注和免疫状态的脓毒症患者的预后差异并探讨其与预后相关性。方法:回顾性分析重症监护医学信息数据库(MIMIC-Ⅲ)中首次入住ICU的成人(≥18岁)初诊脓毒症患者的病历信息。共纳入1540例患者,根据脓毒症患者不同感染解剖来源、组织灌注和免疫状态将其分为不同亚组,采用多因素Cox回归分析,以确定不同感染解剖来源28 d病死率之间的相关性。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,以显示不同免疫状态和组织灌注状态脓毒症患者28 d病死率。结果:①纳入研究的脓毒症患者28 d总体病死率为20.5%,自发性腹膜炎病死率最高(61.9%),其次是肺、内脏穿孔,病死率分别为26.4%、25.6%,肾盂肾炎病死率最低(7.7%),不同感染解剖来源病死率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且校正差异仍有统计学意义(P<0.01)。②在纳入的免疫状态标准中[实体器官移植(SOT)、造血干细胞移植、糖皮质激素等],仅SOT差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),SOT与非SOT脓毒症患者病死率分别为9.9%和21.0%。③难治性低血压的脓毒症患者病死率为29.8%,无难治性低血压者病死率为14.2%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);高乳酸血症的脓毒症患者病死率为26.0%,非高乳酸血症的脓毒症患者为16.1%(P<0.01)。结论:不同感染解剖来源的脓毒症预后存在差异,组织灌注差提示更高的脓毒症病死率,而接受SOT的脓毒症患者病死率更低。脓毒症临床分型可减少异质性对脓毒症临床预后判断的影响,有助于提升其临床精准医疗和科学研究。Objective: To analyze the prognostic differences and explore their relevance to the prognosis of sepsis patients with different anatomical sources of infection, tissue perfusion, and immune status. Methods: The medical records of adult(≥18 years old) patients with primary sepsis who were admitted to the ICU for the first time in the Medical Information in Intensive Care database(MIMIC-Ⅲ) were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 1540 patients were included, and sepsis patients were divided into subgroups according to their different anatomical sources of infection, tissue perfusion, and immune status, and multifactorial Cox regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between 28-day mortality rates for different anatomical sources of infection. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to show 28-day mortality in sepsis patients with different immune statuses and tissue perfusion statuses. Results:①The overall 28-day mortality rate for sepsis patients included in the study was 20.5%. Spontaneous peritonitis had the highest mortality rate of 61.9%, followed by pulmonary and visceral perforation with 26.4% and 25.6%, respectively, and pyelonephritis had the lowest mortality rate(7.7%). The differences in mortality rates between anatomical sources of infection were significant(P<0.01), no matter corrected or uncorrected.②Of the included immune status criteria[solid organ transplantation(SOT), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, glucocorticoids, etc. ], only SOT was statistically significant(P<0.05), with mortality rates of 9.9% and 21.0% for SOT and non-SOT sepsis patients respectively.③The mortality rate was 29.8% in sepsis patients with refractory hypotension and 14.2% in those without refractory hypotension(P<0.01);the mortality rate was 26.0% in sepsis patients with hyperlactatemia and 16.1% in sepsis patients without hyperlactatemia(P<0.01). Conclusion: The prognosis of sepsis differs between anatomical sources of infection, and poor tissue perfusion correlates with higher mortality whi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...