犯罪构成论的司法逻辑化探究  

On the Judicial Logicalization of the Theory of the Constitution of Crime

作　　者：刘远[1,2,3] LIU Yuan

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学刑法与刑事政策研究中心 [2]南京师范大学法学院 [3]江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心、中国法治现代化研究院

出　　处：《法治研究》2023年第1期74-85,共12页Research on Rule of Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“刑法学司法逻辑化语境中的定罪论研究”(项目编号:19BFX094)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：科学的犯罪构成论是体现定罪的实践性、反映基本定罪过程、建构《刑法》中“犯罪和刑事责任”一节统一性的犯罪构成论。对于定罪实践司法性质的正确把握,是科学建构犯罪构成论的先决条件。对于基本定罪过程要区分违法与罪责,肯定主观违法论而否定客观违法论,坚持五个维度的“辩证统一”。据此,犯罪构成应由行为阶层、构成要件阶层、可罚的违法阶层、罪责阶层依次衔接组成。这样的犯罪构成是违法与罪责相区分、控方与辩方均在场、判断过程与判断结论相统一的定罪模式。The scientific theory of crime constitution is a theory that reflects the practical nature of conviction,reflects the basic conviction process, and unifies the section of "crime and criminal responsibility" in our criminal law. A correct grasp of the judicial nature of conviction practice is a prerequisite for the scientific construction of the theory of crime constitution. For the basic conviction process, we should distinguish between illegality and culpability, affirm the theory of subjective illegality rather than the theory of objective illegality, and adhere to the "dialectical unity" of the five dimensions. Accordingly, the constitution of crime should be composed of the class of conduct, the class of constitutive requirements, the class of culpable illegality, and the class of culpability in succession. Such a crime constitution is a model of conviction that distinguishes between illegality and culpability,where both the prosecution and the defense are present, and where the judgment process and the conclusion are unified.

关 键 词：犯罪构成 定罪实践 违法 罪责 控方 辩方 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]